What did the legal community enjoy in 2018?

Sometimes you read the court decision and see: the "Jewish conventions", the calculations in the "minions". We will post about some curiosities of the legal world on our Facebook pages. In 2017, we decided to write a separate article about what happened to us while working. And then they decided to start a tradition - to compile the TOP of their own findings that happened to the team Bargen'a. A year has passed - and we are ready to entertain readers a little again 😉

Norms were dedicated

Earlier, February 23 was celebrated desperately. A striking example happened to us in the case of challenging paternity. After a 2-day drunken marathon, the man seems to have forgotten about the birth of a child 🙂

“Representatives of the plaintiff pointed out the impossibility to have children due to non-standard sexual orientation. On the day of registration of the child (February 25, 2010) the defendant was with his friend and neighbor, with whom he was drunk for several days due to the celebration of "Defender of the Fatherland Day". He did not inform his relatives and acquaintances about the birth of the child ”

Prov: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/33618084

Lose words in 60 seconds.

Interesting story: the prosecutor's office "lost" material evidence in the amount of 25 000$, and the head of the SBU asks the court to return them for ̶п̶р̶о̶в̶е̶д̶е̶н̶н̶я̶ ̶в̶і̶д̶п̶у̶с̶т̶к̶и̶ conducting ORD 🙂 O tempora, o mores!

Prov: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/74628128

To the attention of all DNR performers!

League. The law knows that actually interests lawyers. The issue of appealing against the actions of DPR executors has long needed clarification.

Life and death issues for business owners

Received funny spam on corporate mail. An event for business owners on what to do after their own death 🙂 We don't know why they teach there, but the target audience is chosen professionally.

Moratorium on inspections

The first article in 2018, which received 10,000 views per year and not least because of the images for the post. This is how carefully those control bodies that did not fall under the moratorium conduct inspections. all without exception of enterprises and natural persons-entrepreneurs!

Link: https://bargen.com.ua/2018/01/04/moratorij-na-perevirky-2018

The inspector of the State Labor Service is blocked

It is easier to cancel the fine of the State Labor Service. It is only necessary to prevent the inspector of the State Labor Inspectorate from inspecting. All you need is one closet and one J door

This was done by employees of the sole proprietorship - the inspector could not get into the room because access was blocked by cabinets. However, the inspector could not prove that the cabinets belonged to the FOP and that it was the FOP employees who put them in front of the door. Therefore, the court overturned the decision of the State Labor on the imposition of a fine :)